Where the money actually goes.
A 9.99$ purchase from iTunes nets the artist 0.94 cents. Itunes gets 3.70$ and the record company gets 5.35$. A musician needs to sell 12,399 songs on iTunes a month to make the wages of a McDonalds employee. That is .09 cents for each individual song. Streaming music instead? Listeners on Spotify would have to stream a song 4,053,110 times for an artist to earn a salary equal to minimum wage.
Nothing you can really do about it, no ones else is that I see.
The government knows we're doing it, but they aren't busting down my door as soon as I click the download button. And the way I see it, not everyone can just walk into the store to buy an album just to get two songs off of it. Plus, in the end, iTunes makes you spend a lot also. You don't see the artists flipping out because people are downloading their songs for free. I bet they get lots more money from concerts and items (t-shirts, etc.). And you can't just go and arrest the people who do download illegally, you'd need to put a prison on the moon to fit them all.
If music downloads became illegal, we would have to buy CDs instead, and important businesses like iTunes and the mp3 section of Amazon would be shut down. CDs are already almost obsolete, and there's no reason to make music downloads illegal. It's even convenient since you can easily find different music, you can buy single songs instead of an entire album, and it's impossible for things to sell out, unlike physical CDs. The government has no business telling us what we can download anyway.
Accessibility to download generates revenue
Downloading music should not be illegal. So many people discover artists through the free music they've gotten on the internet! Technology has gotten to the point that artists can't prevent their music from being uploaded, downloaded and exchanged. If those downloading music get it for free, they are much more likely to attend concerts, buy merchandise and support the artists in other ways. The recording industry has made purchasing music legally very expensive. Artists should give their music away with purchases of merchandise, or allow for people to pay what they feel the music is worth, if they are concerned about profit loss.
You can't stop illegal downloading.
It's like Prohibition in the 20's and 30's; people will find a way around it. You can't quell human ingenuity without total brainwashing or government control. There are so many people in the world now that oppose legislation to put harsher controls on internet downloading, etc...it's impossible to stop.
NO. Downloading Movies & Music Should NOT Be Illegal!
The government only prints a certain amount of money and most of this money doesn't go to the common man, it goes to billionaire companies and corporations. How is it fair, scratch that, life obviously ISN'T fair, but how is it LEGAL that a few billionaires pull stupid stunts that mess up the Earth even more, but we still have homeless people and starving children in the world? They have a big enough slice of the cake, they can afford to lose a few crumbs.
No, downloading music should not be illegal. The way music is made available to the public has changed drastically. In the days when vinyl records were the popular format, record companies made huge profits recording and releasing music. As technology and the Internet advanced, music went to CD’s then mp3. The change to CD’s made huge dents in the record company’s profits and the move to mp3 has affected them even more. Record companies would probably like to see downloading made illegal, but it is not likely to happen. Most music now days is downloaded from the Internet. This won’t change unless something drastic happens to the Internet.
There are so many other things similar to this.
Why is it that only downloading music is illegal, if we cant download the music we want, why can you take pictures off of websites and Google,in reality that is plagiarism. By downloading music is in fact not plagiarism, it tells us the date and author, does your pictures? Hmm
No downloading music should not be illegal.
Many people just buy albums and things. Theres a better way to get the songs you want without having to pay anything. Downloading music might shut down industries and famous music stores, but think to yourself; do we really need those industries and music stores. You would think many people would side against me if i'm wrong, but even i don't buy any albums because if you want to hear a song or the whole album you could just go to Youtube and find every music video and album you want to hear. People just waste their money when they buy albums for lets say One direction when you could just get all the music you want from the internet. Nowadays, since theres so much technology, people don't really care THAT much about if you download anything from the internet that is illegal. Unless you get caught. This also goes for movies. Many people, including I, download movies from the internet.. Except that i dont do it illegally. Theres just no point in going and buying the movie because you only need to watch that movie once. So do you really think that downloading music should be illegal?
There is no way it should be made illegal.
It is kind of impossible to be made illegal. If you wanted movie and music downloading to be illegal you would have to shut down the internet because piracy has already gone worldwide. Let's say the new Iron Man comes out in Canada May 4th and in Japan it comes out December 21, the country of Japan would have already uploaded it so Canada people can download it.
Downloading Music. Persuasive Essay That Agrees Downloading Music Is Right And Shouldn't Be Restricted
In 1999, an 18-year-old college drop out named Shawn Fanning invented the program that was Napster. Almost instantaneously upon its release its popularity grew, making the small building located in Redwood City, California an instant controversial interest across America. Napster was an Internet based program that allowed users share and download media files for free. Since Napster didn't hold the files and they originally belonged to the users, it was difficult for the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) to file a case against them. Eventually, at Napster's peak in 2001, it was shut down. Nonetheless, new programs rose to take Napster's place. There are two that still exist and are the most popular, Morpheus and Kazaa, which are used most frequently by the youth of America. Since 2003, the RIAA has found a new way to end file sharing: suing any individual found with an excessive amount of illegal music and charged at an average of $12,500 to $17,000. The prices these kids have to pay are ridiculous and the fact that they are being sued in the first place is an outrage. Because they download music, innocent parents must pay the price. Downloading music for free is easy and convenient and may encourage the user to buy a full album.
The main issue is that sharing music is right. Most of the file sharers are middle class teenagers who would rather listen to that one song instead of buy the whole album. Many teenagers do not have a monthly income to buy albums with that one song they want. Some feel that buying the whole album isn't worth the money as the prices have recently increased within the past few months. Increased album prices only encourage file sharers to share more music more often than before. Even before file sharing programs appeared, people could easily record music from their CDs onto their tapes and give them to friends so they could duplicate the songs as well. But now, file sharing has revolutionized music, so they might as well get used to it.
Yet the RIAA protests that since programs like Napster had appeared, CD sales had gone down. Still they had billions...
Loading: Checking Spelling0%